YouTube Union Structure and Code of Ethics

Reserved for future use

Solarseraph, thanks for all the work you put into this! As a start, I think we should focus on what Jörg already said in his video, which boils down to this: YT should take back all recent changes - No more demonetization or unjustful termination of channels. Transparency.
Be careful not to make too many demands or ask for something they can't do. Keep it simple, concise and be respectful. And, by all means, withstand all attempts to bring politics into this union.

The workers and our Union must remove the Greedy, Racist, Biased, Capitalist owners, send them to jail, and take over management.

WE ARE CRASHING THIS PLANE WITH NO SURVIVORS 

As a part of "How should we not behave," just to keep us moving the a constructive direction: I hereby entreat the forum gods mods for decently aggressive moderation of off-topic conversation. I would like common users to have a way (official feature or not) of easily flagging a post as off-topic, though not necessarily offensive or otherwise punishable

I have thought about a potentially viable leadership structure. One of my hobbies for a couple decades was strategy and tactics simulations. As such, when huddled around the battle grid, the others often turned to me to make the most effective use of limited resources for the most gain to achieve an end goal. Difference is, this is reality, and thus not subject to a cascade of charts, and random variables.

However I will detail my initial thoughts here and if it works for Mr. Sprave, he can have at it. If not seen as viable, i'm sure there are other options to consider. After all an end goal is nice and dandy, but without leadership and a plan, things won't work out for very long.

So to start, Mr. Sprave defaults to the role of Head Director, after all he got the ball rolling this time around.

Now to decentralize the power structure, and give him more wiggle room, Below him would be seated various Directors who have specific tasks to help achieve the end goal. With them would also be seated a Lt. Director on standby, in the event of daily interference like working O.T. Family needs, inclement weather, e.t.c. This adds a layer of redundancy to the upper echelons to keep the engine running smoothly. (and also helps considering how many time zones are represented here.)

The Head Director Mr. Sprave and the Directors then make up the seats of power to help guide the rest of us along this journey.
The Lt. Directors assist the Director of their specific department so the union activities flow smoother.

A few possible Directorships,

Comm/ops: Communications. With information being critical to our operations, Communications would include various forum moderators, The spreading of legitimate facts, and the squashing of misinformation should the need arise. The secondary role of Communications, which will crop up later, is that of Public Relations. So the Director is going to be the Faceman / Facewoman talking in place of Mr. Sprave should the need arise and/or be the primary liason contacting various media outlets to extend our coverage with the public in an effort to gain more support.

Media: This falls under directing, collating, and distribution of assets to further the unions visible presence. This would be the go to staff for depositing Video intro/outros, Audio clips, and images. They would also be tasked with ensuring the credibility and good taste of such media so that it is within the image of the union as a whole as set forth by Mr. Sprave. If the Media team were to double down, they could also be a prime pick for editorial and advertising, distributing copypasta blocks of text to help members spread the message, as well as take a few tips from Hollywood and produce media (in a small infomercial style format perhaps) to help spread the message.

So right off we would have 3 branches, Directors / Communications / Media. I think this would be a good start to make use of our collective talents and be a viable foundation to build on as needed.

Just my two cents